|
|
Blog
|
RSS Feed
Posted by Teanna Spence on Wed, Nov 05, 2008 @ 09:11 AM
Should you considering product mix when creating your sales compensation plans for next year? With sales shrinking or profits eroding, it may be time to evaluate your product mix. Are your sales reps selling products that are less profitable to the company because it's easier? If every dollar of sale counts the same towards quota relief that could be exactly what is happening.
It may be time to step back and evaluate the products the reps are selling and the markets they are selling them to. Are the reps selling the products that are strategic to the company? Will these products help the company survive or grow?
You need to begin to analyze your current sales data. Looks at what products are being sold into each market you are focusing on across the geography boundaries of your sales organization. Next is to look at the gross profit of these sales. Don't forget to analyze the impact of adding new products or obsoleteing older ones.
If you determine that the products being sold are not the right ones, often times a change in focus in the compensation plan can create the desired effect. Change in focus can be accomplished by separating quota, changing rates, adding bonuses, etc. But be careful not to dilute the focus with too many measures or too little money.
 Teanna Spence Compensation Director
Posted by Chrystie Terry on Tue, Oct 28, 2008 @ 09:02 AM
Recession. Down market. What’s happening to sales? If you find yourself in this situation, read on. While sales comp alone isn’t an answer, there are many levers you can pull to help. For starters, you should immediately look to the information stored in your commission system for analysis. Here you can see if you are paying for performance; see blog entry, "Are you Paying for Performance", carrying poor performers, or have any super stars. If you look at the performance distribution curve, you will have a great starting point for optimizing your team. With this perspective in mind, the top strategies are: - Optimize your productivity
- Look for new market opportunities
- Reduce costs.
Optimize productivity. There are a number of possibilities here. First, you should consider rebalancing territories. This problem will be obvious if you have one super star in a lucrative territory while others are well below quota. By providing equal opportunity to all, motivation will increase. Second, consider lowering the quota. Remember, you want 60% of your team to be at or above quota to keep their motivation high. If you are certain your sales are going to drop, lower the quotas so the team is energized while you cut costs elsewhere. Look for new market opportunities. Now is the time to analyze your customers and identify any patterns of success. You may find that certain products are more profitable than others or you are getting traction in a particular vertical. Once you have identified a new market opportunity, changing the compensation plan to focus reps on the new area will reap immediate rewards. Reduce costs. Many companies we are working with are combining the strategies above with lowering the base salary and increasing the upside incentive potential. With clear plans and a more lucrative upside, they are able to keep teams motivated while lowering the fixed salary cost. These are a few ideas. Come to our free webinar on Dec 10th "Sales Compensationfor Tough Times" to learn more.  Liz Cobb CEO Makana Solutions
Posted by Teanna Spence on Tue, Oct 21, 2008 @ 08:49 AM
With the economy in the current state some companies are looking at changing the Target Total Compensation (TTC). TTC is the amount the company plans to pay the sales rep at 100% performance, precisely making every goal. This is also referred to as On Target Earnings (OTE). Each year I recommend an evaluation of your company TTC compared to your industry and geography. This is valuable information and helps you understand where you are in the marketplace competing for the valuable sales resources you need. Recently jobs have been either flat or up slightly year over year. This year it appears the TTC is going down for some jobs.
Are you planning on reducing your TTC next year? Reducing TTC is like a pay cut and can have negative effects on the motivation of your sales force. If you reduce the TTC, how will you keep the sales force motivated while taking away real earning capability?
Will you reduce the quotas or goals to reflect the reality of the economy? Remember when developing a good sales compensation plan you want a team of winners, so the goals may need to be adjusted downward so that even in this economy at least 50% of your reps are at quota or above.
Have you thought about increasing the upside, handsomely rewarding the reps who exceed their quota in this economy? An enhanced upside potential may be just what you need to soften the blow of lower TTC.
Teanna Spence Compensation Director Makana Solutions
Posted by Chrystie Terry on Thu, Oct 16, 2008 @ 10:16 AM
Companies often spend a lot of time and money trying to design the optimal, most effective plan. They may hire consultants, review detailed earnings history or run various analytics to ensure their team plans are good for the business. In doing so, they sometimes overlook the fact that the comp plan must be motivating for the sales team as well. It must reward the team close to the point of influence and provide them the right incentives throughout the year. What is one of the easiest and quickest ways to know if you are properly motivating your sales team ASK THEM! Ask your sales team directly. A true team of professionals will tell you whether or not their comp plans are motivating. I found by surveying the entire team, and then discussing the results and suggestions with a subset or core team yielded much better plans, and hence much better performance. When you include sales team input into your plan design, the team actually takes more ownership of their earnings potential and there tends to be less conflict or confusion around payouts. By asking them, you are also showing that you value their input and recognize them as part of the equation. You can ask them in person or with an online or printed survey. Using an online survey tool, live survey monkey - (free at www.surveymonkey.com) allows you to make it anonymous if you feel that you will get more accurate results that way. Here are 7 basic survey questions you can ask your team: 1. Do you know what your goals are? Do you clearly understand them? 2. Do you feel your goals are achievable?
3. Do you find yourself focusing more of your attention on any one goal? If so, which one?
4. Do you clearly understand how you get paid, and what you need to do to get into your accelerators?
5. Have you run into any conflicts or found yourself competing with someone on your team (direct or channel) over the same deal or account?
6. Do you clearly understand company goals?
7. Do you have suggestions on how to improve your current plan that are in alignment with company goals?
Sometimes the obvious path eludes us, but is often the best. Let us know if this has worked for you. Larry D'Angelo VP Business Operations Makana Solutions
Posted by Liz Cobb on Wed, Oct 15, 2008 @ 08:54 AM
Lately I've been hearing about surprise ‘overpayments' and how distressing they can be. Certainly as a CEO I live by the mantra "cash is king" and the last thing I would want to do is pay too much for anything. So helping companies avoid such surprises has been an important part of my goal of delivering software to help people manage their sales compensation. In the past, I was focused on eliminating overpayments by reducing errors in commission calculations through automation. I have worked with many companies who found that when they replaced their spreadsheets with a commission system there were all kinds of overpayments to reps based on human error intrinsic in the use of spreadsheets. Of course, sales reps are MUCH less likely to report overpayments of this type so the automation process uncovered many such flaws. One company I worked with said "We know we are overpaying about $2M per year. We don't plan to recover it, but can you please make it stop?"
Now, with Makana's focus on plan design, I've discovered a more disturbing ‘overpayment'. Many of the companies we are working with now did not understand how to model their cost exposure prior to rolling out new compensation plans to their employees and channel partners. So they accidentally designed plans that would pay more than they intended for the results they were seeking to achieve. In many ways, these kind of ‘overpayments' are much worse to deal with. For starters, you are contractually obligated to pay them, so mere knowledge of the problem doesn't provide you any means of recovery. Furthermore, you typically don't find out about the problem until you are faced with signing a very big commission check. OUCH.
So this year, spend some time modeling the plans before rolling them out to the team. Look at your cost exposures for overlay positions, windfalls, quotas set too low etc. Correct the problem before it happens.
Liz Cobb CEO Makana Solutions
Posted by Chris Mason on Thu, Oct 09, 2008 @ 08:56 AM
When you hire a group of hungry sales reps, do you ever envision them getting "satisfied" and not selling as much in years 2,3 and 4? Probably not however this scenario gets played out time and time again due to comp plans that drive that exact behavior you fear. Your hunters have become farmers! What is the cause of this phenomena? Comp plans drive behavior and the plans are essentially telling the reps to stop selling. A plan that is designed to garner new clients and retain customers will become ineffective if a company grows quickly. The compensation for account management may exceed the compensation for new business once a baseline of accounts has been established. Adaptation to a quickly changing selling environment is necessary for young companies whose growth quickly outpaces stale or early stage sales compensation plans. Too many companies try to stick to old plans to reduce change only to see sales revenues decrease and sales effectiveness slowly deteriorate. The answer lies in role definition. As a young company, it makes fiscal sense to have one sales rep take care of both new business and existing customers. If the customers need constant contact to remain a loyal customer, then you will have to compensate the rep for this work. However at some point you will need to separate these two tasks into separate job roles. Account managers and sales reps can be compensated in a way that creates a unified selling environment while at the same time bringing back into alignment that old adage, "gain for top performers and pain for the non-performers".  Chris Mason has over 20 years of direct selling experience and has managed both account managers and direct selling reps. For more insight into creating sales comp plans please go to our website, MakanaSolutions.com
Posted by Teanna Spence on Tue, Oct 07, 2008 @ 11:28 AM
Have you taken the time to really evaluate the job roles in your company? With new sales plans on the horizon, now is the time to define your job roles. Defining the job roles correctly brings clarity to the sales organization. Clarity will help razor focus the sales reps in the right direction. Signs that you need to look at your job roles:- Reps are unclear who should be servicing a customer
- Customer sees multiple reps from your company
- Reps are unclear what they should be doing
- Everyone is selling everything to everybody
When a company is young with few sales reps, it is very common to have only one job role. Over time as a company grows and changes without proper monitoring of the job roles they can easily stay blended together. The resulting confusion can hurt revenue, moral and possibly customer relationships. 5 Steps to develop sales roles- Align sales roles with customer facing roles
- Define where the rep should spend their time
- Evaluate rep control over close of business
- Identify the product stage
- Check role alignment with company strategy
A good place to start is to al ign the sales roles with the customer facing roles in this chart. Are the reps generating leads, closing the sales, managing accounts, etc.? To help you understand the current job roles, assess how your reps are spending their time. Are they developing new business, servicing existing customers, etc.? Is this where you want the reps to spend their time in the future? The next thing to look at is the amount of control the rep has over the close of business. Does the rep close the sale or is the rep part of a team that supports the sale? Do they have ownership over the sale or are they in a support role? Finally look at the product stage. Does the rep sell new products, current products or both? Clear concise job roles avoid confusion between the sales reps in your organization. Everyone knows who their target customers is and can focus their attention in the right place.
Now that you have defined the sales roles, step back and look at them together. The job roles must support the company strategy. Make sure that the company is covered and there are no gaps in the organization and people are not stepping on each other. Makana Motivator helps you achieve job role alignment through easy cross plan view analysis.

Teanna Spence Compensation Director
Posted by Liz Cobb on Tue, Sep 30, 2008 @ 09:05 AM
I am very interested in hearing your stories about the unintended consequences of your incentive programs. I think we all have them and we can benefit from sharing them. As the mother of two daughters who have just made it through the teenage years, I believe we are all much better off if we talk to others about the ways they (teenagers or incentive programs) can act out. It gives you perspective, lets you laugh at the absurdity and helps you know what to watch out for. My Story - Teamwork
So, I'll start. My story happened at an enterprise software company. The company sold expensive software that required expensive service implementations. It was imperative that the company operate as a team between sales, service and engineering. We were constantly making tradeoffs between product features and services, frequently opting to defer features we felt could be ‘managed' by the services team. Services and engineering needed to work together. Similarly, sales needed the services team to help make proposals to clients that were realistic yet within the client's budgets. Teamwork was essential all around.
But it didn't happen. Turns out much of the problem lay in the incentive plans. The services team was compensated on margin while the sales team was compensated on software sales. And just to add a nasty twist, the head of engineering was also being compensated on new sales. What happened? The service bids would come in too high (because they wanted the margins) so instead, the sales team got quotes from engineering and gave away the services component. Much friction ensued and I would estimate close to $2M was lost in revenue while customer satisfaction dropped.
Moral of the story: look at the metrics across job roles and make sure your teams are incented to work together.
Do you have a story? I'd love to hear it.
 Liz Cobb CEO Makana Solutions
Posted by Teanna Spence on Wed, Sep 24, 2008 @ 08:42 AM
People are using Makana Motivator to analyze their compensation plans in new ways and seeing a few surprises while they are doing it. Often times when a compensation plan is designed in excel or worse on the back of a napkin, it is hard to analyze the plan. In addition to being hard to see things in excel, may times the designer runs out of time to really analyze the plans. Here are the 3 plan surprises that I here most frequently. - Paying too much for under performance
- People are really surprised by what they are spending for under performance. They never took the time to figure out what the plan will pay out at 50% of quota. I never realized that I am spending that much for under performance is a common comment when they first view their plan payout by looking at the graphs in Motivator.
- Paying too little for over performance
- People are really surprised by how little they are paying for over performance.Often times the same rate continues well beyond attaining quota or jumps up some but not enough. Wow I thought I was paying much more when they exceeded their target is a common comment I hear when looking at the plan payout above quota.
- Not paying the right amount for on target performance
- People are surprised that the plans they designed are not paying out what they expected to pay out when the reps makes his quota. And to make matters worse, more than half of the plans I look at are actually paying outmore at 100% performance then the designer had intended.
 Motivator can help you analyze your current sales plans now. Once your plans are easily entered in Motivator, you can use the graphs and mini-modeling capability to understand what your sales plans are really paying out. In the By Total Attainment graph, you can easily see that the plan as designed will pay out the correct TTC (Target Total Compensation) at 100% attainment. You can also use the sliding bar to change the attainment to analyze various levels of attainment. Teanna Spence Compensation Director
Technorati Profile
Posted by www.makanasolutions.com Admin on Thu, Sep 18, 2008 @ 08:16 AM
If you read Liz Cobb's recent post titled "Is your sales team a team of winners," then you know best practice states that you want to allocate targets such that 60% of your team is at or above quota. You also want your sales force striving to achieve Winner's Circle status, and more importantly, the title of ‘Top Sales Rep.' When you have a good portion of your reps in this position it encourages behaviors that you want from your team: - Stimulates healthy competition and camaraderie amongst the team,
- Creates more energy and excitement as the year winds down
- Ensures a diligent work effort until the final numbers are tallied -
Is your Winners Circle too Easy? You may feel the Winner's Circle is either too easy to achieve at this level or not deemed special enough by having more than half of the sales force achieving Winner's Circle status. After all, you want to make this achievement prestigious and only reward your top most performers. In this case, set the Winner's Circle goal at a figure somewhere over 110% of quota. This will ensure that only your top performers are rewarded with that special trip or reward. Let us know what works or does not work for you.
 Larry D'Angelo VP Business Operations
All Posts | Next Page
Error sending email
Email sent successfully
|
|